MARY WOLLSTONECRAFT’S NOTION OF WOMEN EMPOWERMENT: A CRITIQUE
Faculty
Department
Year of Publication
Publication Type
Abstract
This project explores Mary Wollstonecraft’s notion of women empowerment as articulated in her landmark work, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman and of ersahilosophical critique of its strengths and limitations. Wollstonecraft argued that women
are rational beings endowed with reason and virtue, and thus deserve equal access to education and opportunities as men. For her, education was the foundation of empowerment, enabling women to escape dependency, achieve moral autonomy, and
contribute to the social and political fabric of society. By framing women as active moral agents rather than passive ornaments, she challenged the patriarchal norms of her time and laid the groundwork for modern feminist thought. Nevertheless, her ideas were also shaped by the constraints of Enlightenment rationalism and her social context. Critics argue that her emphasis on reason reduced empowerment to assimilation into male- defined ideals, overlooking the value of emotion, care, and diference. Wollstonecraft often justified education for women in instrumental terms, linking it to their roles as wives and mothers rather than affirming it as an intrinsic right. Her focus also reflected a largely Eurocentric and middle-class orientation. This critique, therefore, evaluates her enduring contributions while highlighting the need for more inclusive, intersectional perspectives
are rational beings endowed with reason and virtue, and thus deserve equal access to education and opportunities as men. For her, education was the foundation of empowerment, enabling women to escape dependency, achieve moral autonomy, and
contribute to the social and political fabric of society. By framing women as active moral agents rather than passive ornaments, she challenged the patriarchal norms of her time and laid the groundwork for modern feminist thought. Nevertheless, her ideas were also shaped by the constraints of Enlightenment rationalism and her social context. Critics argue that her emphasis on reason reduced empowerment to assimilation into male- defined ideals, overlooking the value of emotion, care, and diference. Wollstonecraft often justified education for women in instrumental terms, linking it to their roles as wives and mothers rather than affirming it as an intrinsic right. Her focus also reflected a largely Eurocentric and middle-class orientation. This critique, therefore, evaluates her enduring contributions while highlighting the need for more inclusive, intersectional perspectives
Supervisor(s)
co-supervisor


