optometry

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE UTILIZATION OF OPTOMETRY CLINIC SERVICES AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN THE UNIVERSITY OF BENIN

Year of Publication
Publication Type
Abstract
Access to quality eye care services among university students is critical for maintaining visual efficiency, academic performance, and general well-being. Despite the availability of a well- equipped Optometry Clinic within the University of Benin, anecdotal evidence suggested that many students under-utilize its services. Understanding the factors influencing utilization is vital for improving access and strengthening preventive eye care strategies in tertiary institutions. To assess the factors influencing utilization of optometry clinic services among undergraduate students of the University of Benin. A descriptive cross-sectional study design was adopted. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire assessing demographic information, awareness, eye health-seeking behaviour, and barriers to utilization. 382 undergraduate students were selected through stratified random sampling across faculties and levels of study. This study shows that 60% of proportion of undergraduate students in the University of Benin have utilized the available eye-care services at least once. Chi-square tests assessed factors associated with clinic utilization with a significance level set at p < 0.05. The study showed that proximity (p = 0.021) to clinic was the only factor with a statistically significant association with clinic utilization. Short waiting time (p = 0.366), friendly staff (p = 0.318), availability of drugs and spectacles (p = 0.631) showed no significant association. The findings support the need for enhanced awareness programs, affordable service models, and policy integration of routine eye examinations into student health programs to improve vision care accessibility and utilization.
Supervisor(s)
co-supervisor

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE SINGULAR AND COMBINED EFFECT OF SORGHUM BICOLOR AND ANDROGRAPHIS PANICULATA LEAF EXTRACTS ON BLOOD PRESSURE, BLOOD SUGAR AND INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE LEVELS.

Year of Publication
Publication Type
Abstract
Non-communicable diseases like high blood pressure, diabetes, and glaucoma cause serious health issues and hardships in sub-Saharan Africa, often made worse by a lack of access to regular medical services. This research examines how the leaf extracts from Sorghum bicolor and Andrographis paniculata affect blood pressure, blood sugar, and eye pressure in healthy adults, both separately and together. One hundred and seventy-four (174) participants (mean age 34.3 ± 7.1 years) received single administrations of hot aqueous extracts of S. bicolor, A. paniculata, or a 1:1 mixed extract. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) and IOP (mmHg, right eye [RE] and left eye [LE]) were measured at baseline and four hours post- administration. The results revealed statistically significant reductions (p < 0.05) across all parameters in all treatment groups. For Sorghum bicolor, systolic pressure decreased from 126.15 ± 15.9 to 120.80 ± 15.0 mmHg, diastolic pressure from 85.60 ± 11.1 to 80.03 ± 10.4 mmHg, blood glucose from 82.86 ± 14.61 to 70.39 ± 11.99 mg/dL, and IOP from 16.88 ± 2.5 to 15.83 ± 1.6 mmHg (right eye) and from 17.14 ± 1.93 to 16.12 ± 1.8 mmHg (left eye). Similar reductions were observed with Andrographis paniculata, where systolic pressure fell from 129.44 ± 14.7 to 121.20 ± 16.9 mmHg, diastolic pressure from 84.60 ± 13.3 to 77.13 ± 11.4 mmHg, and blood glucose from 83.61 ± 13.2 to 75.26 ± 11.43 mg/dL, while IOP decreased to 14.49 ± 2.0 mmHg (right) and 15.98 ± 2.0 mmHg (left). The combined extract produced the greatest effect, with systolic pressure reducing from 134.63 ± 15.7 to 128.68 ± 15.9 mmHg, diastolic pressure from 87.10 ± 22.1 to 77.90 ± 12.2 mmHg, blood glucose from 80.42 ± 12.04 to 74.40 ± 10.20 mg/dL, and IOP from 15.94 ± 1.8 to 14.94 ± 2.0 mmHg (right) and 15.67 ± 1.5 to 15.13 ± 2.7 mmHg (left). These results demonstrate that both Sorghum bicolor and Andrographis paniculata extracts—singularly and in combination—can significantly lower blood pressure, blood glucose, and intraocular pressure within a short period following administration. The enhanced effects observed with the combined extract suggest possible synergistic interactions between their phytochemical constituents.
Supervisor(s)
co-supervisor

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN VISUAL ANOMALIES AND HEARING IMPAIRMENT

Year of Publication
Publication Type
Abstract
Background: Dual sensory impairment, involving both visual and auditory deficiencies, significantly impacts an individual’s ability to communicate, learn, and navigate their environment. Research suggested that hearing-impaired individuals were at a higher risk of developing ocular abnormalities, including refractive errors and contrast sensitivity deficits. Given their reliance on vision for communication, understanding the prevalence and nature of visual impairment in this population was crucial for effective healthcare interventions. Purpose: To determine the relationship between visual and hearing impairment in affected individuals. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the school for the hearing impaired in Benin City using purposive sampling. Participants were selected based on inclusion criteria, with demographic and hearing-impairment data obtained from school records and teachers. Visual assessments included Tumbling E visual acuity testing, ophthalmoscopy, retinoscopy, subjective refraction, contrast sensitivity testing using the Pelli-Robson chart, and cover test. Data were collected using structured forms and analyzed using SPSS Version 25.0. Data Analysis: Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were employed. The prevalence of visual impairment and contrast sensitivity abnormalities was determined. Chi-square tests assessed associations between age, gender, and dual sensory impairment. Results: Among the 100 hearing-impaired participants examined, hyperopia (34%) was the most common refractive anomaly, followed by compound hyperopic astigmatism (15%), while mixed astigmatism (4%) was the least. Visual impairment before correction was 6%, and after refraction, normal vision increased to 96% with 2% impaired. Contrast sensitivity was normal in 96% of participants, with 2% showing mild reduction. No severe visual impairment, blindness, or significant association with age or gender was found. Conclusion: Hearing-impaired individuals showed a high prevalence of correctable refractive errors. Most visual deficits improved with refraction, underscoring the importance of routine vision screening and timely optical correction in schools for the hearing impaired. Contribution to Optometry: This study provided valuable insights into the relationship between visual and auditory impairments, supporting improved screening and management strategies for individuals with dual sensory impairment.
Supervisor(s)
co-supervisor