Society

Oath-practice is one of the channels of Justice, and is provided for in the law Although oath declares a solemn promise and establishes some conduct and liability, many individuals act contrary to their promises. Lying under oath is perjury (a crime). Thus in an African traditional setting, oath involves some curse (or vindication)—it attracts the wrath ofgods if one acts against one 's allegiance. Hence oath is the final arbiter. Even though Kelson considers the grundnorm as the foundation ofall other laws, he fails to locate it in the sphere ofjustice. More-over, one must recognize that humans could be deceptive and, therefore, unreliable. In this case, oath is supreme in that no human category can validate oath further as its Grundnorm nor form the basis of its authority; obligation to it is a compulsion because of its efficacy. Accordingly, the main objective of this article is to analyze some literature on justice, espouse the pitfalls in Keisen ’s (positivist) theory and articulate the metaphysical bases of oath. To achieve this, the work adopts the qualitative/analytic methodology. It discovers that, based on the deceptive/finite nature of man and the African experience (as expressed among the Etsako ofNigeria), the very idea of a Grundnorm is extra-human. The work concludes that among traditional Africa, an efficacious oath is final arbiter and, therefore, the Grundnorm. Hence the work recommends that traditional African mode of oath-taking should be enshrined in modern court setting so as to assure ultimate justice.

The issue of same-sex marriage (S-SM) has become a source of worry around the world. While some countries have legalized the practice, some other ones have not; and yet others are considering formalizing it beyond mere civil union. There are so many philosophical (favorable and others against) arguments about the practice of S-SM, ranging from religious, cultural, legal, and political grounds. However, that the idea ofS-SM isbeing accorded a modicum of praxis around the world implies that there, in the least, are some perceived (or real) social values of the practice. Hence this theoretical but lateral article, by analyzing of specific available literature on human sexuality vis-a-vis marriage/sex, explains the essential nature of (the issues concerning) S-SM or union, and articulates the possible social and psychological values accruable from the practice. It outlines and juxtaposes the moral and legal suasions surrounding the doctrine of S-SM so as to spit an overview of its personal/psychological and social values. It thus articulates a philosophical basis for the possible tenability of the same-sex (S-S) union as state doctrine and policy for nascent society that desiresto stamp out the excesses of orthodox marriages such as, in the least, violent rivalry arising from sexual interests, gender agitations, and avert population explosion.

Oath-practice is one of the channels of justice, and is provided for in the law. Although oath declares a solemn promise and establishes some conduct and liability, many individuals act contrary to their promises. Lying under oath is perjury (a crime). Thus in an African traditional setting, oath involves some curse (or vindication)—it attracts the wrath of gods if one acts against one ’s allegiance. Hence oath is the final arbiter. Even though Kelson considers the grundnorm as the foundation of all other laws, he fails to locate it in the sphere of justice. More-over, one must recognize that humans could be deceptive and, therefore, unreliable. In this case, oath is supreme in that no human category can validate oath further as its Grundnorm nor form the basis of its authority; obligation to it is a compulsion because of its efficacy. Accordingly, the main objective of this article is to analyze some literature on justice, espouse the pitfalls in Keisen ’s (positivist) theory and articulate the metaphysical bases of oath. To achieve this, the work adopts the qualitative/analytic methodology. It discovers that, based on the deceptive/finite nature of man and the African experience (as expressed among the Etsako of Nigeria), the very idea of a Grundnorm is extra-human. The work concludes that among traditional Africa, an efficacious oath is final arbiter and, therefore, the Grundnorm. Hence the work recommends that traditional African mode of oath-taking should be enshrined in modem court setting so as to assure ultimate justice.