HUME’S SKEPTICISM

This study explores David Humes skepticism and its implication for human knowledge. Emphasizing the challenges posed by his empirical approach of philosophy, Hume argues that all human understanding is rooted in sensory experience, yet he questions the validity of inferences made beyond immediate observation. His skepticism (extent) to concepts of causation induction, and the self-suggesting that our beliefs about the world are often unfounded. The study examines Humes critique of rationalism particularly his assertion that reason is subordinate to passion in guiding human 9 behavior. It also discusses the implications of human’s skepticism for epistemology, particularly the limitations of certainty in knowledge acquisition. By analyzing Humes contributions, the study highlights the enduring relevance of his philosophical inquiries in contemporary discussions about the nature and limits of human’s knowledge.