PERSPECTIVE

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN NIGERIA: HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE AND CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES

Department
Year of Publication
Publication Type
Abstract
The topic critically examines the enduring and controversial practice of the death penalty within Nigeria’s legal system. Though a feature of Nigerian law since the colonial era, its continued application stands in stark contrast to global abolitionist trends and poses significant questions regarding the sanctity of fundamental human rights enshrined in the 1999 Constitution (as amended). The study employs a doctrinal approach, analyzing relevant Nigerian statutes, key judicial pronouncements, particularly of the Supreme Court and pertinent international human rights instruments to which Nigeria is a party. The Human Rights Perspective critically assesses the death penalty's impact on the constitutional rights to life as provided in Section 331 and freedom from torture or inhuman and degrading treatment as provided in Section 342 . It highlights concerns surrounding the finality of the sentence in the face of flawed criminal justice processes, the persistent issue of wrongful convictions, and the ethical implications of the "death row phenomenon." The study subsequently investigates the Constitutional Challenges, focusing on two primary areas: the legality of the mandatory death sentence for certain offenses, which limits judicial discretion, and the constitutional validity of execution methods. It analyzes the evolving jurisprudence of Nigerian courts which, while largely upholding the constitutionality of the death penalty, have concurrently introduced judicial safeguards and stricter interpretations of due process. The research concludes that the practice of capital punishment, especially its mandatory nature and the lengthy delays preceding execution, is increasingly difficult to reconcile with the fundamental tenets of modern constitutional democracy and international human rights law. It recommends a legislative review to abolish mandatory sentencing and proposes a national moratorium as an essential step toward eventual abolition
Supervisor(s)
co-supervisor

CORRELATION OF DIVORCE ON THE WELL BEING OF CHILDREN IN OGBE COMMUNITY, EDO STATE. A SOCIAL WORK PERSPECTIVE

Author(s)
Year of Publication
Publication Type
Abstract
The study sets to examine the correlation of divorce on the health and lifestyle of children in Ogbe Community. It also investigated ways in which children are affected psychologically and emotionally leading to the breakdown of their physical health and social challenge. Four research questions were raised. The descriptive survey research design was adopted for this study. Existing literature on divorce and health and lifestyle of children are often hinged on the holistic approach of parents, without considering the effects on the well-being of children. Three(3) secondary schools in Ogbe Community were selected based on access to road and the population available in the area. The sample size of this study consisted 150 secondary school students selected through stratified proportionate sampling technique. The research instrument that was used to elicit opinions and facts from the secondary school students was structured questionnaire. It was however subjected to face validity by the researcher’s supervisor. Findings from the study indicate that children of divorced parents are more likely to experience negative health and lifestyle outcomes, including psychological distress, emotional instability, and social difficulties.
Supervisor(s)
co-supervisor