Abstract
Heavy metal content was determined by analyzing water samples taken from Ebira camp, Akoko Edo Local Government, Edo state. In all, ten samples were taken at ten distinct Ebira camp sampling sites. With the aid of the Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (AAS), the samples were
examined and tested for five distinct heavy metals: iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), and nickel (Ni). The average concentrations of these heavy metals are 1.0384, 0.5362, 0.2975, 0.0376, and 0.0244 mg/l for Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, and Ni, respectively. The acquired results
were compared to the 2011 WHO standard, which corresponds to Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, and Ni values of 0.3, 1.0, 2.0, 0.1, and 0.1, respectively. With the exception of iron, which has a mean iron content higher than the WHO guideline, the results indicated that the concentration of heavy metals in the area was generally lower than levels permitted by the WHO. The possibility exists that an excessive amount of iron in the groundwater could promote the growth of bacteria responsible for the foul smell. Geospatial analysis of the gathered data was done using geographic information system (GIS) software. Maps showing pollution concentrations and patterns of spatial distribution were produced using spatial interpolation techniques (kringing or inverse distance weighting).
According to the heavy metals' spatial distribution map, manganese (Mn) levels varied greatly throughout the region, with the eastern and northeastern regions exhibiting the highest values. According to the nickel concentration map, the region's southwest is where the concentration of
nickel increases most unevenly. The zinc content of the water rose non-uniformly from the community center to the boundary, according to the spatial distribution map of zinc. The spatial distribution map of copper reveals that the amount of copper in groundwater rose unevenly from
the region's center to its borders, with the community's center having the lowest level of copper and the region's northeastern regions having the highest copper value. The spatial distribution map of iron indicates that there was also a non-uniform increase in the iron content of the water.
Anthropogenic factors, such as factories or industries, agricultural practices, or geogenic processes, such as variations in the composition of the underlying rock or soil, are to blame for the irregularities in the geographical distribution maps. It may also be connected to the metallic ion
concentration and volume at each site. The groundwater in the study area, is generally less contaminated by heavy metal pollution, with little to no contamination index.Heavy metal content was determined by analyzing water samples taken from Ebira camp, Akoko Edo Local Government, Edo state. In all, ten samples were taken at ten distinct Ebira camp sampling sites. With the aid of the Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (AAS), the samples were examined and tested for five distinct heavy metals: iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), manganese
(Mn), and nickel (Ni). The average concentrations of these heavy metals are 1.0384, 0.5362, 0.2975, 0.0376, and 0.0244 mg/l for Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, and Ni, respectively. The acquired results were compared to the 2011 WHO standard, which corresponds to Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, and Ni values
of 0.3, 1.0, 2.0, 0.1, and 0.1, respectively. With the exception of iron, which has a mean iron content higher than the WHO guideline, the results indicated that the concentration of heavy metals in the
area was generally lower than levels permitted by the WHO. The possibility exists that an excessive amount of iron in the groundwater could promote the growth of bacteria responsible for the foul smell. Geospatial analysis of the gathered data was done using geographic information system (GIS) software. Maps showing pollution concentrations and patterns of spatial distribution were produced using spatial interpolation techniques (kringing or inverse distance weighting).
According to the heavy metals' spatial distribution map, manganese (Mn) levels varied greatly throughout the region, with the eastern and northeastern regions exhibiting the highest values. According to the nickel concentration map, the region's southwest is where the concentration of
nickel increases most unevenly. The zinc content of the water rose non-uniformly from the community center to the boundary, according to the spatial distribution map of zinc. The spatial distribution map of copper reveals that the amount of copper in groundwater rose unevenly from
the region's center to its borders, with the community's center having the lowest level of copper and the region's northeastern regions having the highest copper value. The spatial distribution map of iron indicates that there was also a non-uniform increase in the iron content of the water. Anthropogenic factors, such as factories or industries, agricultural practices, or geogenic processes, such as variations in the composition of the underlying rock or soil, are to blame for the irregularities in the geographical distribution maps. It may also be connected to the metallic ion concentration and volume at each site. The groundwater in the study area, is generally less contaminated by heavy metal pollution, with little to no contamination index.