FREEDOM

A will is the final testament of a person. It contains directions as to how the person wants their estate to be administered. Prima facie, a person has the freedom to dispose their property in a manner that pleases them. However, there are limitations or restrictions to a person's testamentary freedom. This study aims to identify the various ways a person's testamentary freedom can be limited by law, cultural norms and religious dictates. It is trite principle in law that a person can make a will, but it does not mean that he can freely dispose his estate with no limit to his power of testation. This study examines the relevant judicial precedents and statute with regards to restrictions on testamentary disposition, as well as the challenges that arise with the wrong use of testamentary capacity. This study also examines the how cultural practices can affect testamentary disposition. Using the doctrinal method of research, it specifically investigates the effect of the trite principle of "nemo dat quod non habet” on testamentary freedom. The study goes further to identify other areas that affect testamentary freedom such as the effect of family property, the fetters Islamic law places on testators and the position on the law on provision for family members and dependents. This study tries to highlight the various ways, cultural and religious norms places restrictions on the testamentary freedom of a testator. The long essay also tries to identify modern developments in testamentary freedom. The study tries to suggest reforms to clarify the legal process of testamentary freedom and disposition. In conclusion, this long essay provides insight into the legal dynamics that govern testamentary disposition and offers practical solutions to lawyers and individuals especially testators and testatrixs seeking to navigate the murky waters of testamentary freedom and disposition.

The Right to freedom from discrimination is a Fundamental Human Right world over, of which Nigeria is subscribed to observe in her laws as a democratic and civilized state. This freedom from any form of deprivation or stigmatization based on sex, religion, ethnicity, circumstances of birth, political opinion and other such related bases is protected in Nigeria’s Constitution, various state provisions and policy documents and International pacts. However, the reality in practice in the try today portrays a wide drift from the provisions of the law in such aspects as political appointments, trade and business ease, work modalities, Farmer- Herder relations and attendant crisis, state of origin, Indigene-Settler question, Quota system practice, and such other manifestations of different levels of discrimination. Also in issue is the contradiction of some state practices and federal policies against the constitution and perhaps, the constitution against itself