EXAMINATION

State sponsored torture remains a serious human rights concern despite its clear prohibition under international and regional law. In Nigeria and South Africa, reports of torture by state agents, especially police and security personnel, continue to raise questions about respect for human dignity, the rule of law and accountability within state institutions. This study examines state sponsored torture through a comparative analysis of Nigeria and South Africa in order to understand why the practice persists and how both countries have responded to it. The study aims to examine the nature and justification of state sponsored torture and to assess the effectiveness of the legal and institutional frameworks designed to prevent it in Nigeria and South Africa. A doctrinal and comparative research approach is adopted, drawing on legislation, court decisions, international conventions, official reports and relevant academic writings. The study finds that although both countries have formally committed themselves to the prohibition of torture and have put legal safeguards in place, enforcement remains weak in practice. South Africa has recorded more progress, largely due to its strong constitutional culture and oversight mechanisms, while Nigeria continues to struggle with poor implementation of laws, limited accountability for offenders and deep rooted institutional impunity. In both jurisdictions, torture is still commonly justified on the grounds of security, crime control and public order. The study concludes that ending state sponsored torture requires more than legal prohibition. It demands genuine political will, effective oversight of security agencies and a culture of respect for human rights. The study recommends stronger institutional accountability, improved enforcement of existing laws and continuous human rights training as practical steps toward addressing torture in both Nigeria and South Africa

State sponsored torture remains a serious human rights concern despite its clear prohibition under international and regional law. In Nigeria and South Africa, reports of torture by state agents, especially police and security personnel, continue to raise questions about respect for human dignity, the rule of law and accountability within state institutions. This study examines state sponsored torture through a comparative analysis of Nigeria and South Africa in order to understand why the practice persists and how both countries have responded to it. The study aims to examine the nature and justification of state sponsored torture and to assess the effectiveness of the legal and institutional frameworks designed to prevent it in Nigeria and South Africa. A doctrinal and comparative research approach is adopted, drawing on legislation, court decisions, international conventions, official reports and relevant academic writings. The study finds that although both countries have formally committed themselves to the prohibition of torture and have put legal safeguards in place, enforcement remains weak in practice. South Africa has recorded more progress, largely due to its strong constitutional culture and oversight mechanisms, while Nigeria continues to struggle with poor implementation of laws, limited accountability for offenders and deep rooted institutional impunity. In both jurisdictions, torture is still commonly justified on the grounds of security, crime control and public order. The study concludes that ending state sponsored torture requires more than legal prohibition. It demands genuine political will, effective oversight of security agencies and a culture of respect for human rights. The study recommends stronger institutional accountability, improved enforcement of existing laws and continuous human rights training as practical steps toward addressing torture in both Nigeria and South Africa

Acalypha indica Linn. stem, a widely utilised medicinal plant in traditional health systems, was investigated for its phytochemical composition, anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic, and anti-benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) activities. The stem bark was successfully extracted with ethyl acetate using cold maceration techniques. The phytochemical examination, antioxidant capacity, anti-inflammatory activity, glucose adsorption assay, and in vivo anti- BPH evaluation were carried out using established analytical methods.Phytochemical profiling using GC–FID revealed appreciable levels of phenolics, flavonoids and alkaloids, including ephedrine (19.21 mg/g), cortisol (10.06 mg/g), rutin (0.64 mg/g) and quercetin (0.50 mg/g), alongside phenolic compounds such as resveratrol (1.43 mg/g). The antioxidant potential were examined using Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) Assay. The extract
displayed concentration-dependent total antioxidant capacity, increasing from approximately 15%-19.7% across near 0–80 mg/mL concentration. In anti-inflammatory assessment, the extract significantly inhibited heat-induced haemolysis, with values increasing from approximately 45% to 55% inhibition at the highest concentration, indicating potent membrane-stabilising ability. In anti-diabetic evaluation, the glucose adsorption capacity of the extract ranged from 1.38–0.17 mM/g at (0–80 mg/mL glucose) concentration, having higher adsorption at 20mg/ml lower than acarbose (4.84–10.78 mM/g), but showing inconsistent adsorption behaviour across concentrations. In testosterone-induced BPH rats, the extract produced significant modulation of prostate biomarkers. Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) decreased from 2.40 ± 0.64 ng/mL in testosterone induced BPH control to 1.37 ± 0.03, 1.07 ± 0.09 and 1.17 ± 0.15 ng/mL at 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg, respectively, approaching values similar to normal control at higher doses. dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels reduced from 66.23 ± 11.03 ng/mL in testosterone induced BPH control to 47.70 ± 3.91, 38.40 ± 4.33 and 42.30 ± 5.08 ng/mL, while prostate volume and weight were markedly lowered, with 100 mg/kg producing the greatest reduction (0.06 ± 0.01 mL and 0.190 ± 0.01 g), comparable to finasteride -a standard control drug. All extract-treated groups showed consistent increases in body weight over 14 days, particularly at 50 and 100 mg/kg, indicating
good tolerance. The combined antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities demonstrated the protective ability of the extract against BPH-associated changes. These findings conclude that Acalypha indica stem extract possesses promising therapeutic
potential as a natural agent for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia, warranting further toxicological and clinical investigations.