CONCRETE STRENGTH

EVALUATION OF CONCRETE STRENGTH BY PARTIALLY REPLACING THE COARSE AGGREGATE WITH BLAST FURNACE SLAG

Year of Publication
Publication Type
Abstract
This project aims to evaluate the strength of concrete by partially replacing the coarse aggregate by Blast Furnace Slag (BFS). The primary objective is to determine the effect of replacing natural granite with BFS in varying percentages (2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, and 10%) on the strength and durability of concrete. The research is motivated by the need to find sustainable alternatives to natural aggregates, reduce construction costs, and promote the reuse of industrial by-products in the construction industry. The methodology involved preparing concrete mixes with BFS replacing granite at 0%, 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, and 10% by weight. The materials to be used include Ordinary Portland Cement, fine aggregates (sharp sand), coarse aggregates (granite and BFS), and potable water. Standard laboratory tests were conducted, including sieve analysis for particle size distribution, slump test for workability, compressive strength and flexural strength tests at curing ages of 7, 14, and 28 days, and Aggregate Impact Value (AIV) and Aggregate Crushing Value (ACV) tests to assess aggregate quality. A constant mix proportion was maintained for all specimens, with curing performed under controlled conditions to ensure comparability of results. The results revealed that the control mix (0% BFS) achieved the highest compressive strength of 21.08 N/mm² and flexural strength of 9.60 N/mm² at 28 days, while 2.5% BFS replacement yielded comparable strengths of 19.29 N/mm² and 8.56 N/mm², respectively. Workability decreased with increasing BFS content, with slump values reducing from 30 mm (control) to 16 mm (10% BFS). The AIV and ACV values confirmed that both aggregates were mechanically durable, though granite performed slightly better. It was concluded that BFS can be used as a partial replacement for granite up to 2.5% in structural concrete without significant loss of performance, while higher percentages are more suitable for non-structural applications
Supervisor(s)
co-supervisor

EVALUATION OF CONCRETE STRENGTH BY PARTIALLY REPLACING THE COARSE AGGREGATE WITH BLAST FURNACE SLAG

Year of Publication
Publication Type
Abstract
This project aims to evaluate the strength of concrete by partially replacing the coarse aggregate by Blast Furnace Slag (BFS). The primary objective is to determine the effect of replacing natural granite with BFS in varying percentages (2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, and 10%) on the strength and durability of concrete. The research is motivated by the need to find sustainable alternatives to natural aggregates, reduce construction costs, and promote the reuse of industrial by-products in the construction industry. The methodology involved preparing concrete mixes with BFS replacing granite at 0%, 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, and 10% by weight. The materials to be used include Ordinary Portland Cement, fine aggregates (sharp sand), coarse aggregates (granite and BFS), and potable water. Standard laboratory tests were conducted, including sieve analysis for particle size distribution, slump test for workability, compressive strength and flexural strength tests at curing ages of 7, 14, and 28 days, and Aggregate Impact Value (AIV) and Aggregate Crushing Value (ACV) tests to assess aggregate quality. A constant mix proportion was maintained for all specimens, with curing performed under controlled conditions to ensure comparability of results.The results revealed that the control mix (0% BFS) achieved the highest compressive strength of 21.08 N/mm² and flexural strength of 9.60 N/mm² at 28 days, while 2.5% BFS replacement yielded comparable strengths of 19.29 N/mm² and 8.56 N/mm², respectively. Workability decreased with increasing BFS content, with slump values reducing from 30 mm (control) to 16 mm (10% BFS). The AIV and ACV values confirmed that both aggregates were mechanically durable, though granite performed slightly better. It was concluded that BFS can be used as a partial replacement for granite up to 2.5% in structural concrete without significant loss of performance, while higher percentages are more suitable for non-structural applications.
Supervisor(s)
co-supervisor